When help is everywhere,
what remains yours?
The premise. Omnibecoming examines how AI assistance changes the people using it: what they practise, what they understand, what they delegate and what they remain responsible for. It is written for people already using AI in creative work and everyday decisions — people who want distinctions they can apply to their own choices, not promises about their transformation.
The promise of this project is useful questions and honest material. It is not guaranteed personal growth, and it does not claim that assistance is inherently harmful. The writing must also make the strongest case for what help makes possible.
The name. It entered this project through a question about religion: what happens if AI becomes capable and pervasive enough that people increasingly turn to it for knowledge, guidance and meaning — and a generation grows up with no memory of a world before it?
The word needed a correction early, and the correction stays: complexity does not establish divinity, and exceptional capability does not establish wisdom. Applied to a machine, “omnibecoming” describes an imagined horizon of increasing capability. Applied to a person, it could become an exhausting demand — a human life takes shape through commitments, and commitments leave some possibilities unrealised. The name survives because the question underneath it does.
Both paragraphs above are drawn from the opening essay, The Machine That Described Me (exploratory draft, 26 September 2026), where the fuller argument is made.
The project — six statements
-
What exists here
One essay, in exploratory draft. One book, in development. This site is hand-built: static pages, no scripts, no tracking, nothing that reports on your reading.
-
What does not exist
No tools, no course, no subscription, no products. Each future product needs a concrete use and a real audience before it earns a page here. None has one yet.
-
How the work is labelled
Every text states its status: exploratory draft, revision, or published essay. Drafts are written with AI assistance and say so. Provenance is part of the argument, not a disclosure at the end of it.
-
What the writing tries to do
Ask a specific question. Earn attention with an example and reasoning. Distinguish evidence, interpretation and speculation. Leave meaningful objections standing.
-
What it refuses to do
Invent biography, authority, endorsements, release dates or spiritual claims. A machine’s capability does not establish wisdom, and this site will not pretend otherwise.
-
Where to start
Read the opening essay, then the book’s honest account. If one distinction is worth keeping: a description can fit without its author knowing what it is like to be the person described.
Author credit remains open while the drafts are exploratory. This site is published under the project’s name, and the person behind it signs nothing here that has not been examined first.